banner2e top

Gunshot Investigated at Black Newspaper in Virginia

Gunshot Investigated at Black Newspaper in Virginia

gunshot at free press

 Richmond Police Detective Dale Shamburg investigates gunshot damage to a window on the second floor at the Richmond Free Press building on March 4 as Free Press Editor/Publisher Raymond H. Boone pays close attention. The inset: Close-up of the bullet hole and shattered glass. PHOTO: Sandra Sellars/Richmond Free Press

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The Richmond, Va. Police Department are investigating a gunshot to the window of the headquarters of the Richmond Free Press, a 21-year-old award-winning Black newspaper in the former capital of the Confederacy.

First discovered by Free Press staff members March 3, the nighttime vandalism also included ripped window blinds and scattered debris in the Free Press newsroom, the paper reported this week.

“Thankfully none of our staffers were on duty when our window was bullet-holed and desks were dotted with glass,” said Free Press Editor/Publisher Raymond H. Boone in an editorial published in the March 14-16 edition of the paper, known for its award-winning confrontations with political and economic power brokers on behalf of the poor and racially oppressed.

The editorial said Police Detective Dale Shamburg “suggested the shot came from a shotgun blast fired from a nearby parking lot across from the Richmond Times-Dispatch and the blast may have come from partygoers.”

Boone wrote that the criminal behavior mirrors “an uncivilized act that fits in the same category as past and ongoing schemes to shut down the Free Press.”

The newsroom blast is the latest in a string of destructive incidents targeting the Free Press since the newspaper opened in Downtown Richmond in 1992. They have been so plentiful and destructive that the authorities at the paper reported them to the FBI as well as the police.

Those incidents have included distribution boxes flattened by big-tire vehicles; Free Press editions burned in distribution boxes; racist messages scrawled on the front of the distribution boxes; boxes stolen and papers thrown into trash containers; and the fencing of boxes to block reader access to copies of the newspaper.

But, in the defiant tones reminiscent of Black newspaper editorials throughout history, Boone appears unfazed.

“Despite the consistent vandalism, the Free Press will remain unyielding in its commitment to stand strong for what’s right and to give an equally strong voice to the voiceless,” the editorial states. “The Free Press will not be intimidated. Neither will we bow to political and economic schemes viciously intended to control the Free Press.”

CBC Chair Now 'Confident' on Obama's Diversity Commitment by Zenitha Prince and Hazel Trice Edney

Updated March 21, 2013

CBC Chair Now 'Confident' on Obama's Diversity Commitment
By Zenitha Prince and Hazel Trice Edney

repmarciafudge

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – Congressional Black Caucus Chairwoman Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio), has significantly toned down her chiding of President Obama after saying his cabinet so far is too White male-dominated. She has now taken a wait and see approach after a conversation with Obama’s White House advisors.

“I have talked to the White House and I am confident, after our conversations, that the President is committed to diversity, so we are waiting to see what the rest of the cabinet will look like,” Fudge told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell on air March 15.

Fudge was not available for further elaborate this week. Her latest posture is a major step down from a letter to the President dated only three days earlier in which she took him to task for not appointing any African-American cabinet members thus far.

“I am concerned that you have moved forward with new cabinet appointments and yet, to date, none of them have been African American,” she told the president in the March 11 letter. “You have publicly expressed your commitment to retaining diversity within your cabinet. However, the people you have chosen to appoint in this new term have hardly been reflective of this country’s diversity.”

The letter followed an earlier letter Fudge sent the President in January in which she asked him to consider her colleagues Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.) and Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) for the posts of Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of Labor, respectively.

Attorney General Eric Holder is currently the only African-American member of the Obama cabinet. There are two African-Americans with cabinet rank but who are not part of the order of succession for the presidency: U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice. Kirk announced he would step down March 14. Valerie Jarrett, a Black woman, is a highly regarded and highly visible senior advisor to the president and his assistant for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs, but not a cabinet member per se.

This absence of more diversity among Obama’s top advisors and agency heads has frustrated Blacks, a feeling that Fudge initially said “is compounded by the overwhelming support” the president has received from that community. Her posture this week reflects hope that the President is simply not finished with his appointments. As expressed in her recent letter, she says, diversity is essential for moving all of America forward.

“As you continue choosing your critical advisors, we want to stress the importance of ensuring every community has a seat at the table,” Fudge said in her letter. “The absence of diverse voices leads to policies and programs that adversely impact African Americans.”

Zenitha Prince is a reporter for the Afro American Newspaper.

NAACP-LDF Leader Calls for Civil Rights Focus on ‘New Economy’ by Hazel Trice Edney

March 10, 2013

NAACP-LDF Leader Calls for Civil Rights Focus on ‘New Economy’
By Hazel Trice Edney

ifill

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – America’s continuous struggle with economic woes that have disparately impacted African-Americans and other people of color must signal to the civil rights community a need to not only expand its focus – but change its strategy.

This according to Sherrilyn Ifill, the new director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, who received rousing applause during a welcoming reception late last month.

“And so we have to figure out how we’re going to deal with this issue of the new economy. Where do we fall in that? Where do the people that we represent fall in the new credit realm, in the new mortgage lending realm? How are we going to deal with the loss of African-American wealth by the foreclosure crisis that has really decimated the Black middle class?” Ifill grilled an audience of hundreds of lawyers, civil rights activists and leaders of non-profits. “So, we’ve got to step out and begin to take on those issues for our future and that’s my desire as I take up this position at the Legal Defense Fund.”

Ifill started at the New York office of the LDF in 1988 as a voting rights lawyer before leaving to teach at the University of Maryland School of Law five years later. After more than 20 years of teaching, legal consulting and continuing to litigate, the veteran lawyer has returned to her first love.

As her civil rights colleagues listened intently during the Downtown D.C. reception, she reminded them of the “Educational Fund” part of the LDF, which too often gets lost in the name. That is one part that strategically must now become a priority, she said.

“Part of our charge is to engage in a conversation with the American public about what’s really happening to African-Americans. We love that they’re able to see a president and his wife get off Marine One with their kids. Without question, that’s a tremendous success, due in some part to LDF. But there is another America - another African-America,” she stressed. “And our job is to make sure that the picture of that African-America stays at the forefront of the vision of people in this country. And we only do that by committing to show them that African-America and that Latino America and that Asian America and that elderly America and that poor America and all of the people who are living under the margin and behind the veil of American success and prosperity.”

Reaction to her 20-minute talk ranged from energetic applause to hearty chuckles. Perhaps the most humorous line was her use of the Super Bowl to make her point about the need for a greater offense.

“I’m from Baltimore, home of the Super Bowl champions and we’re known for our defense … I had to get that in,” she said to laughter from the audience. “But the lessons of the Ravens is that although we’re known for a great defense we did recognize that we had to lift our offense…We recognized that we had to have a quarter back who could throw, that we had to have people who could block, that we needed a runner that we needed what we call depth on our offense…And I’ve come back to the Legal Defense Fund in pursuit of depth on our offense.”

Though she encouraged her colleagues to “defend the wins” that have been made, such as the then pending arguments in the Shelby vs. Holder voting rights case, she stressed that there must now come a shift in the strategy.

“I’m not interested in just defending what we have already been able to establish. I’m really interested in our pushing ourselves forward to try and realize an America that does not yet exist,” she said, continuing the football analogy. “It’s the perfect time for me because I feel so powerfully and so passionately about the issue of voting rights; because I believe that we really have to be on the offense on this issue…We have to continue to advance the ball.”

The wins have been many, she pointed out. As the seventh in a line of NAACP-LDF director-counsels, she praised the work of her predecessors. In the audience were former director-counsels Ted Shaw and Elaine Jones. Ifill succeeds John Payton who died suddenly last year. Preceding them were founder Thurgood Marshall in 1940, Jack Greenberg and Julius Chambers consecutively.

“They created this world in which we have statutes that theoretically protect us from employment discrimination and protect us in the voting realm and protect us from educational segregation and so forth. And we have to defend those winds and the Supreme Court now has put us in the position where we are pretty regularly defending them. Even after they’ve been upheld, we’re back defending them again. But we cannot allow ourselves to only play a defense game,” she said.

She named a string of economics-related issues plaguing Black America that must be studied and must be documented in order to educate America. Those issues include the school to prison pipeline, the impact of the “new economy” on people of color, the housing crisis and safe quality education.

Though she described herself as energetic, she stressed the need for the civil rights community to pull together as a united front because no one person can do it alone.

“The job is enormous, the work is huge and I am mortal,” she said. “It only happens when we are linked together and when we’re working in partnership. All of the gains of the civil rights legal community have been rendered by us standing close together, communicating with each other, determining what we want and going for it with tenacity. And that’s why I’m happy to see so many of you here tonight because it’s an expression of your commitment to continue doing that.”

Mayors Campaign to Decrease Gun Violence by Noelle Jones

March 17, 2013

Mayors Campaign to Decrease Gun Violence
By Noelle Jones 

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Howard University News Service

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - More than 850 mayors from big cities and small towns across the country have joined a coalition - Mayors Against Illegal Guns - aimed at protecting the rights of Americans who own guns, while fighting to keep criminals from possessing guns illegally.

Founded in 2006 by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Boston Mayor Thomas More with only 15 members, this organization has grown and is working to disseminate its message and to organize in efforts to stop gun violence.

“With more than one million grassroots supporters—many of whom joined after the Newtown shooting by signing our Demand A Plan petition, Mayors Against Illegal Guns is now the largest gun violence prevention advocacy organization in the country,” said Mayors Against Illegal Guns Communication Director Erika Soto Lamb.

The Demand A Plan Campaign is a call to action aimed at lowering the startling statistics of gun violence and saving the lives of the 33 people who are killed in the United States daily by guns. The main goals of the campaign are to get Congress to pass legislation requiring every gun buyer to pass a criminal background check, to get military assault weapons and high capacity magazines off of the streets and to make gun trafficking a federal crime. Research from Mayors Against Illegal Guns Trace Data Center found that about 40 percent of guns acquired in the United States annually come from unlicensed sellers who are not required by federal law to conduct background checks on gun purchasers.

After the shooting in Newton, Conn., President Obama dedicated himself to delivering a set of concrete proposals to address the epidemic of gun violence in the United States. The Demand A Plan campaign believes that requiring a criminal background check for every gun sale should be apart of the plan. However, in order for these background checks to be effective, states must submit millions of missing records to background check databases.

These missing records are visible, fatal gaps partially responsible for the estimated 8,000 deaths caused in the United States by firearms, according to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report. In D.C., the campaign reported, 4,557 reports were missing compared to the 477 that were submitted. If legislation to require universal background checks is passed, the submission of these missing reports into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System could be the difference between a mentally unstable individual being cleared to carry a firearm or not, supporters of the legislation say.

Demand A Plan is determined to do something about the staggering statistics nationwide—the use of about 25 celebrities like Beyonce, Cameron Diaz and Jamie Fox is one technique they’re using to raise awareness.

The use of celebrities, some featured in violent action-packed films in the Demand A Plan video has come under fire, with some criticizing the use of actors who have been more than ‘trigger happy’ in their films.

“Just because an actor or artist has been in a v­­iolent movie doesn’t somehow offset their credibility to talk about gun violence. They’re mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters—proud Americans. We can talk about violence in (our) culture, but ultimately it’s the gun that matters,” Soto Lamb said.

“If we don’t do a better job of keeping these weapons out of the wrong hands, it won’t matter what sort of movies Hollywood is making. Movies are better regulated than guns are. Fifteen year olds can’t just buy a ticket for a violent movie yet the NRA opposes laws to prohibit terrorists from buying guns and won’t close loopholes that let criminals and dangerously ill people easily buy assault weapons,” she said.

For 20-somethings, the use of celebrities in the video makes it that much more attention grabbing.

“ It is the perfect way to go about advertising keeping guns out of illegal hands. A regular citizen doesn't have the type of platform and can't reach the attention of as many people as a celebrity can,” said freelance journalist LaParis Hawkins. “When you see your favorite celebrity advocating for such a big issue you stop and listen.”

The Demand A Plan Campaign allows supporters to donate funds and to sign a petition for Congress. Those who cannot afford to give monetarily are encouraged to call their elected officials to demand that they support "common sense"’ gun reforms. They can also utilize social networks to increase visibility of the campaign's message.

"We together can work towards a safer future,” Hawkins said. “America's obsession with guns has to cease.”

March to Protect Vote: Challenge to Preserve Section 5 of Voting Rights Act

March 10, 2013

March to Protect Vote:
Challenge to Preserve Section 5 of Voting Rights Act

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Richmond Free Press

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “We will never give up or give in.”

Congressman John Lewis made that vow as he and Vice President Joe Biden led 5,000 people across Selma’s Edmund Pettus Bridge to re-enact “Bloody Sunday,” the heroic, historymaking voting rights march that the Georgia Democrat headed 48 years ago.

In March 1965, the youthful John Lewis and others were nearly beaten to death when Alabama state troopers brutally attacked peaceful freedom marchers as they crossed the bridge on the way to the state capital in Montgomery.

That attack galvanized the Civil Rights Movement and pushed Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act the same year, finally opening Southern polling places to millions of African-Americans and bringing an end to all-white rule.

Congressman Lewis used Sunday’s pilgrimage across the bridge to call for new determination to uphold the hard-won law. Biden, the first sitting vice president to participate in the annual re-enactment, joined in that call. He said nothing shaped his consciousness in 1965 more than watching TV footage of the police assault on Congressman Lewis and the other marchers for daring to seek the right to vote.

“We saw in stark relief the rank hatred, discrimination and violence that still existed in large parts of the nation,” he said in recalling the horror he watched.

While those 1965 marchers “broke the back of the forces of evil,” the vice president said that challenges to voting rights continue in the largely Republican-backed push to restrict early voting and voter registration drives and the enactment of voter ID laws where no voter fraud has been shown.

The Rev. Jesse Jackson said Sunday’s event had a sense of urgency because the U.S. Supreme Court had just heard a request from a mostly white Alabama county to strike down a key portion of the Voting Rights Act.

“We’ve had the right to vote 48 years, but they’ve never stopped trying to diminish the impact of the votes,” said Rev. Jackson before taking part in the march. Referring to the Voting Rights Act, another veteran civil rights leader, the Rev. Al Sharpton, said: “We are not here for a commemoration. We are here for a continuation.”

One surprising participant in the march was archconservative House Majority Leader Eric I. Cantor, R-Henrico, who said he was “proud to march alongside Congressman Lewis, who courageously paved the way for a better life for future generations.”

A supporter of many of the new restrictions such as voter ID, Congressman Cantor also has been a supporter of the Voting Rights Act. He joined Congressman Lewis in voting to renew the act in 2006, and last year Congressman Cantor pushed to have the House historian collect video testimony from Congressman Lewis and other congressional participants in the voting march to create a record of their experiences.

The march was held just four days after the Voting Rights Act came under scrutiny from the Supreme Court. Alabama’s Shelby County is asking the court to throw out Section 5 of the act, the requirement that federal approval be sought for election law changes in Alabama and Virginia and seven other states

with histories of suppressing the African-American vote.

Attorney General Eric Holder, the defendant in Shelby County’s suit, told marchers that the South is far different than it was in 1965 but is not yet at the point where the most important part of the Voting Rights Act can be dismissed as unnecessary. Rev. Jackson decried the attempt to throw out Section 5, which he called the key enforcement mechanism to protect voting rights.

“An unenforced law is no law,” the Rev. Jackson said in expressing concern that the Supreme Court could do “something terribly damaging to democracy” when it decides the case.

He predicted that if Section 5 is lost, the South would employ more gerrymandering and at-large voting to dilute the African-American vote.

X