Amidst Same-Sex Marriage Debate: Jackson, Sharpton Implore Blacks to Keep 'Eyes on the Prize'
By Hazel Trice Edney

Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. PHOTO: Roy Lewis/Trice Edney News Wire

Rev. Al Sharpton PHOTO: Roy Lewis/Trice Edney News Wire

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Why is it that with the Black jobless rate astronomically high, schools crumbling in Black neighborhoods, low test scores and dropout rates plaguing Black children and home foreclosures, incarceration, death and disease soaring in Black communities, why is it that some Black people are saying they will not go to the voting polls because President Barack Obama agrees with same-sex marriage?

That is the question that brought the Rev. Jesse Jackson to tears on Saturday, Sept. 22, during a forum at the Congressional Black Caucus Annual Legislative Conference. The question also riles the Rev. Al Sharpton, who believes some people are actually being paid to advocate staying home on Nov. 6.

Rev. Jackson used a handkerchief to wipe away tears as he sat on the panel at the Saturday morning brunch, recalling how he was jailed on July 6, 1960 for trying to use a public library and still targets pervasive racial injustices across America. Given the atrocities he sees, he’s “not quite ready to prioritize same-sex marriage” as an issue in the Black community.

Teaching the audience a quick lesson that brought them to roaring and empathetic laughter, he asked them to respond to the following questions:

“How many of you have a relative in jail? Raise your hand…How many of you support Medicare and Medicaid? Raise your hand…How many of you support social security? Raise your hand…How many have or know someone with home foreclosure? Raise your hand...You know somebody in student loan debt? Raise your hand…You know somebody with credit card debt? Raise your hand…You know of voter suppression? Raise your hand…You know somebody who needs a job? Raise your hand.”

With nearly every hand raised in response to most questions, Rev. Jackson then hit the audience with the unexpected question: “How many have ever been invited to a same-sex marriage?...How many has ever had one in your church?” Not a hand was raised in the room of about 300 people, who broke into laughter – mainly at themselves.

“While we [should be] arguing about our option of Medicare, Medicaid, housing, jobs, and justice, we are arguing about whether someone has the right to engage in a wedding that you were not invited to,” Rev. Jackson said as the audience roared with applause and laughter.

Rev. Jackson said he believes the same-sex marriage debate in the Black community is being caused by right wing conservatives who have pushed their priorities onto the Black community. "I don’t want anybody to jump line and pull on us their priority,” he said.

Likewise, the Rev. Al Sharpton also believes the pervasive discussion on same-sex marriage is a sinister agenda on the part of a stealth right wing that might even be funding those Blacks who advocate not going to the polls.

“I would say that that is the most ridiculous thing I’ve heard,” Sharpton said in a brief interview during Saturday night’s CBCF Phoenix Awards Dinner. “First of all, we have disagreed with every president on something. Bill Clinton put bills through that hurt us – welfare reform..We’ve never talked about not voting. I think that some of the people who are saying this are sponsored by our enemies because show me anywhere in history where we’ve ever said we’re not going to vote because we disagree with the opinion of a president. He didn’t propose a law, he didn’t say he was going to campaign for a law. He gave an opinion and then all of a sudden they tell people don’t vote? Somebody’s sponsoring this.”

The Rev. Dr. Jamal-Harrison Bryant, who has aimed to register a million voters before the Nov. 6 election says he has been told directly by some pastors that they will not be voting because of President Obama’s stance on same-sex marriage. This position gives civil rights leaders an even greater urgency to inspire people to go to the polls.

“President Barack could actually win the debates and lose the election,” said Jackson.  “I would urge us to keep your eyes on the prize. Hold on. Hold on. Don’t win the same sex debate and lose the right to a house, health, education, jobs, and justice.”

First Lady at CBC Dinner: 'Our Journey is Far, Far from Finished!'
By Hazel Trice Edney

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – First Lady Michelle Obama, speaking to a standing-room-only dinner crowd of more than 2,000 mostly African-Americans Saturday night, drew from the experience of the Civil Rights Movement to inspire people to vote, saying although “there are no more ‘whites only’ signs keeping us out, no one barring our children from the schoolhouse door, we know that our journey is far, far from finished!”

Receiving rousing applause from the audience at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s Annual Phoenix Awards Dinner, Mrs. Obama, who has accompanied the President as he addressed the dinner the past three years, clearly intended to inspire the people to turn out on Nov. 6 – even in an atmosphere of voter intimidation in dozens of states around the nation and during a season of apparent voter apathy in the Black community.

"So we cannot let anyone discourage us from casting our ballots," she said. "We cannot let anyone make us feel unwelcome in the voting booth. It is up to us to make sure that in every election, every voice is heard and every vote is counted. And that means making sure our laws preserve that right. It means monitoring the polls to ensure that every eligible voter can exercise that right."

She continued, "This is the movement of our era -- protecting that fundamental right not just for this election, but for the next generation and generations to come. Because in the end, it’s not just about who wins, or who loses, or who we vote for on Election Day. It’s about who we are as Americans."

Dozens of Republican-led states have taken on new voter laws; particularly requirements that voters show identifications at the polls. Despite contentions that the new laws are meant to prevent voter fraud, civil rights leaders contend the motive is to inhibit the voting of Blacks and Latinos, especially given that there is little evidence of a voter fraud problem in the U. S. Civil rights leaders predict at least five million African-Americans could be disenfranchised because of the changes.

Though the First Lady only alluded to voter intimidation as she spoke of the fight for the right to vote, her speech focused as much on the possibility that some might stay at home on Election Day.

“As citizens of this great country, that is our most fundamental right, our most solemn obligation -- to cast our ballots and have our say in the laws that shape our lives. Congressman Lewis understood the importance of that right. That's why he faced down that row of billy clubs on the Edmund Pettus Bridge, risking his life so we could one day cast our ballots,” she said. “But today, how many of us have asked someone whether they’re going to vote, and they say, no, I’m too busy -- and besides, I voted last time; or, nah, it’s not like my vote is going to make a difference? See, after so many folks sacrificed so much so that we could make our voices heard, too many of us still choose not to participate.”

As Mrs. Obama exhorted people to the polls, the President was out on the campaign trail. In fact, as the CBC dinner got started at 6, the President was campaigning in Milwaukee.

Though her speech was punctuated with applause, the quiet buzz among people in the audience was still about the President’s absence.

“She was on point. She probably wasn’t as fiery as the President would have been, but the message was well-spoken and well-taken,” said Gretchen Wharton, a Washington, D.C. native who has attended when the President was speaking.

Last year, President Obama received thunderous applause although some CBC members took offense to his chiding, telling them to “stop complaining”. The President’s subtle rebuke was an obvious response to some CBC members who had publically criticized him for not taking direct action to lower the Black jobless rate.

The message of First Lady Michelle Obama was clearly different, even stroking the 41-year-old, 43-member CBC with a large part of her speech, which was focused on the Caucus’ history and struggles on behalf of America.

“Since its earliest days, this caucus has been taking on challenges and leading the way in the urgent work of perfecting our union -- fighting for jobs and health care, working to give all our children opportunities worthy of their promise, standing up for the least among us every day, and earning the proud distinction as the ‘conscience of Congress.’”, she said to applause. “That is the legacy of this Caucus. And that's also what I want to talk a little bit about tonight. I want to talk about how we carry on that legacy for the next generation and generations to come.”

Ultimately, she used a story to remind the audience of the fact that, despite any disagreements with the President, they helped him to make history four years ago as the Nation’s first Black President. In doing so, she told the story of a little boy who visited the White House with his parents and brother and a photo that resulted.

“The father was a member of the White House staff, and he’d brought his wife and two young sons to meet my husband. In the photo, Barack is bent over at the waist. And one of the sons -- a little boy, just about five years old -- is reaching out his tiny little hand to touch my husband’s head,” she described.

“And it turns out that upon meeting Barack, this little boy gazed up at him longingly and he said, ‘I want to know if my hair is just like yours.’ And Barack replied, ‘Why don’t you touch it and see for yourself?’ So he bent way down so the little boy could feel his hair. And after touching my husband’s head, the little boy exclaimed, ‘Yes, it does feel the same!’”

Mrs. Obama concluded, “Now, every couple of weeks, the White House photographers change out all the photos in the West Wing -- except for that one. That one -- and that one alone -- has hung on that wall for more than three years. So if you ever wonder whether change is possible, I want you to think about that little black boy in the office -- the Oval Office of the White House -- touching the head of the first Black President.”

With that, she exhorted the applauding audience to press their way to the polls in the face of the history and modern day racial struggle in America:

“So through all the many heartbreaks and trials, all of you, and so many who came before you, you have kept the faith. You could only see that Promised Land from a distance,” she said. “But you never let it out of your sight. And today, if we are once again willing to work for it, if we’re once again willing to sacrifice for it, then I know -- I know -- that we can carry on that legacy. I know that we can meet our obligation to continue that struggle. And I know that we can finish the journey we started and finally fulfill the promise of our democracy for all our children.”

National Congress of Black Women Bestows Five with 'Truth Award'

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Six Black professionals were honored by the National Congress of Black Women during its Annual Brunch following the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s Annual Legislative Conference on Sunday, Sept. 23. Dr. E. Faye Williams, national chair of the organization, presented the recipients of the 2012 Truth Awards and the Good Brother Award before a packed audience of nearly 800.

Named for abolitionist and rights activist Sojourner Truth, the Truth Awards are given each year to women who display remarkable leadership in their fields. A Good Brother award is also given.

Pictured, Left to Right are: Good Brother award recipient Dr. John Hope Bryant, founder of Operation Hope, America’s first non-profit social investment banking organization; NCBW Chair Dr. Williams; and Truth Award recipients:  Veteran Black Press journalist Hazel Trice Edney, president/CEO of Trice Edney Communications and News Wire, the first Black woman owner of a national news wire; Award-winning Secret Service veteran Paula A. Reid, Special Agent in Charge of the Miami Field Office of the Secret Service; nationally-renowned psychiatrist and race-theorist Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, author of the Cress Theory on Color Confrontation and Racism; Retired Air Force Pilot Monica Smith, accepting the posthumous award for Mildred Hemmons Carter, Alabama’s first Black female pilot and the first civilian hired for the Tuskegee air project; and integrative family physician Sakilibi Mines, MD, a prolific health educator and medical director at the Institute of Multidimensional Medicine and Medical Spa.

Sept. 23, 2012

Study: Black Person Killed By Police Every 36 Hours
By J. Kojo Livingston

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Louisiana Weekly

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Using government documents and direct investigations a group has issued a call to action, citing that in the first six (6) months of 2012 a Black person was killed by a police officer, security guard or vigilante.

“The Report on Black People Executed without Trial by Police, Security Guards and Self-Appointed Law Enforcers January 1 – June 30, 2012”, was produced by Arlene Eisen and Kali Akuno for the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement (MXGM). Special assistance was given by Ajamu Baraka. It is available online at mxgm.org

The report comes at a time when the extrajudicial killings of Blacks is on the increase nationally, raising concerns that this is a systemic trend. From California to Florida the killings of mostly unarmed Black males has become a frequent occurrence. In most cases the officers are cleared of any wrongdoing, further heightening racial tensions.

The report and the trend raise the question regarding the safety of innocent Black people who in many cases already have to beware of dangers from the criminal element in their neighborhoods. The notion that one has to expect abuse or violence from those who are hired, paid, trained, armed and sworn to protect communities is a source of anger and discontent from North to South.

Louisiana is no stranger to this trend.

Across the nation there have been high-profile executions of unarmed Blacks and numerous complaints regarding police abuse and misconduct. Internal Affairs Bureaus have little credibility in most cities. Their reputation is for declaring that its officers acted appropriately or “within guidelines” no matter what the behavior or how many witnesses, or other evidence may be presented. Unwarranted beatings, tasings, and other abuse often go unreported because citizens have no confidence in the ability of police to police themselves.

Nationally, leaders are openly questioning the sincerity of police and other officials at resolving the problem.

In New Orleans things have come to a head, thanks to the efforts of Dr. Romell Madison, brother of one of those killed and one wounded in the infamous post-Katrina Danziger Bridge killings.

According to New Orleans ac­tivist, Wesley Johnson, one of the leaders of Community United for Change, “Madison made numerous trips to Washington to the Department of Justice asking them to investigate the problem. His pleas were ignored until the Obama administration took over and sent someone to investigate. The investigators met with CUC who urged them to go beyond the Danziger Bridge shootings, which they did. The community held its own hearings in five neighborhoods where residents were able to come and testify, on video, regarding their treatment at the hands of police on a regular basis. The information from these hearings plus DOJ’s own investigations resulted in a Consent Decree mandating a new process to review complaints against police.”

The community thought progress had been made, however, they are extremely upset because the Department of Justice is now trying to leave the community out of the review process.

New Orleans civil rights attorney Tracie Washington told the Sun, “The disappointment here is that the U.S. Department of Justice, the City and the Independent Police Monitor have hijacked this process from the people. The I.P.M. is not getting beat up; the DOJ is not getting beat up by cops. It’s the run-of-the-mill Black folks, particularly Black males on the street who are suffering from police misconduct who need to be involved in this process and they are being removed. I’m hoping that the judge will find a place for a monitor who can balance police responsibility and rights and community responsibility and rights.”

According to Johnson four entities sought to be involved in the intervention process, they were: the Police Association of New Orleans (PANO), the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) the Independent Police Monitor (IPM) and Community United for Change (CUC). All but one of those entities consist of city employees and that one will be excluded from the process if officials have their way.

“CUC was initially denied a place in the intervention process because they said our intervention would pose a hardship on the process and would slow the process down. They gave all four interveners 30 minutes to address an open hearing, which will be held in New Orleans on Friday, September 21,” says Johnson. “We are opposing that the Consent Decree be put into effect because there was no inclusion of not only the community but of any agency that this work is going to fall on if the Consent Decree is accepted.”

“If the decree goes through without including the public, it’s going to be a flawed process. You won’t get the results this could be historic. I hope the judge will look at this as an opportunity to do something really huge,” says Washington.

Some of the disturbing statistics gathered in the report on the 120 extrajudicial killings include:

• 55 (or 46 percent) had no weapon at all at the time they were executed.

• 43 (or 36 percent) were alleged by police to have weapons (including a cane, toy gun and bb gun) but this allegation is disputed by witnesses or later investigation.

• 22 (or 18 percent) were likely armed.

• In the first half of 2012, police alleged that 42 of the people they executed attempted to run away from them.

• 24 of the people who were killed allegedly pointed guns at officers and/or attempted to crash into them. Reports often do not mention if the officers were wearing uniforms or if the “suspects had any way of knowing their assailants were not civilians.

• 48 (40 percent of 120) of police accounts explicitly cite “suspicious behavior or appearance” or traffic violations as the reason for their attempt to detain the person who they eventually killed.