banner2e top

Black Voters Make Significant Gains in Off-Year Election By Barrington M. Salmon

Nov. 14, 2023

Cliff Albright

Cliff Albright, Black Voters Matter

Kami Chavis, an associate provost and professor of law at Wake Forest University, poses for a portrait in Reynolda Hall on Tuesday, September 4, 2018.

Kami Chavis, law professor

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - By most measures, the Republican Party got an old-fashioned beating by an American electorate who rejected the current iteration of the Republican Party, Trumpism and the party’s extremist MAGA agenda.

Across 37 states, Nov. 7, Americans voted for governors, judges, school boards and local ballot initiatives in what is called an “off year” or non-presidential election. By Wednesday morning, Democrats - with its base of Black voters - emerged as winners in Kentucky, Ohio and Virginia. Perhaps the most consequential result was in Ohio where an unusual coalition of Democrats, Republicans, liberals, moderates and conservatives, young and old, passed Issue 1 – 57 percent to 43 – which enshrines abortion and reproductive rights into Ohio’s constitution.

“One thing we’re seeing in terms of abortions and some other issues is that there is real anger around what (former President Donald) Trump and the Supreme Court did,” said Bill Fletcher, prominent labor union leader, former president of TransAfrica Forum and a senior scholar with the Institute for Policy Studies. “It’s also playing out in Ohio and Kansas. It’s kind of a popular rejection of male authority. I think this is fantastic. And the school board losses show that it has gone but so far.”

Law Professor Kami Chavis concurred.

“Honestly, to me, it’s not surprising because when you look at most of the polls, they tell you that America is not in favor of restrictions. These views cross the political spectrum,” said Chavis, the R. Hugh and Nolie Haynes Professor of Law and Director of the W&M Center of Criminal Justice Policy and Reform at William & Mary Law School. “We do not want the pendulum to swing too far. We don’t want to go back to women in back alleys, or in this time, having to travel so far to get reproductive healthcare.”

The string of electoral losses by Republicans since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade last year is clear evidence of the extreme public displeasure and resistance to what the court and far-right elements have been pushing, pundits and critics said. According to the Washington Post, whenever abortion rights positions have appeared on the ballot, they have won 75 percent of the time across more than 50 polls and two dozen states.  

“Opposition to criminalizing doctors and erecting other barriers to women’s reproductive health should be a message to Republicans and anti-abortion policymakers,” said Chavis, a constitutional Law professor with a law degree from Harvard Law School. She is a former assistant US attorney for the District of Columbia.

Meanwhile, in Virginia, Democrats won full control of the state legislature by holding their majority in the Senate and seizing control of the House of Delegates. These wins denied Gov. Glenn Youngkin an electoral trifecta and the power to impose his conservative agenda. The governor had promised a 15-week abortion ban as a “sensible compromise,” but Democrats fought back with ads and statements which tied Youngkin to the extremist faction of the GOP.

Political experts and pundits said that although Virginia voters didn’t have to vote directly for or against abortion rights, the contentious, divisive and consequential issue infused all the campaigns. Of particular importance reproductive rights activists and supporters said, is the fact that Virginia has become the last southern sanctuary and refuge for those seeking access to legal abortions and reproductive care.

Controlling the General Assembly will give Democrats the numbers and leverage to block fundamental portions of Youngkin and the GOP’s conservative agenda. Democrats are expected to introduce constitutional amendments for voters to enshrine abortion rights into the state’s constitution and end the permanent disenfranchisement of returning citizens with felony convictions.

With the electoral shift, House Minority Leader Don Scott (D-Portsmouth) is poised to become the first Black speaker in the House’s more than 400-year history.

“We’ve been telling you all since day one that Democrats had the message, the candidates, and the momentum to put a stop to the extreme Republicans’ agenda,” Scott said during a victory speech in Richmond.

Chavis said the off-year election results left her hopeful and optimistic. She also lauded wins by African Americans in Rhode Island (Gabe Amo, elected the state’s first Black congressman); and Cherelle Parker, 51, chosen as Philadelphia’s 100th mayor. She is the Black and the first woman to ascend to that position.

“(Parker’s win) is adding to Black mayors in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Chicago,” Chavis said. They are not getting elected because they represent Black interests. They represent broad cross-sections of our country. I think we really can’t separate this from greater representation across the politic spectrum. It’s good to see. It’s not healthy or sustainable that one party only represents one ethnic or racial group.”

Voting Rights and social justice activist Cliff Albright said these victories were made possible by sustained work by devoted activists in the trenches.

“As we reflect on the events of Tuesday, one thing is clear – local elections matter and your voices matter,” said Albright, co-founder and executive director of BlackVotersMatter (BVM) in an email statement. “Black voters impacted key races and were victorious on several critical issues: In Kentucky, we supported partners like KY BLACK, KY Commonwealth Alliance Voter Engagement (CAVE), VOCAL, NAACP, Until Freedom and others to get out the vote for the governor's race targeting key cities such as Louisville, Frankfort, and Lexington. In Virginia, voters helped retain control of the Senate and helped take back the House, preventing any abortion ban. Candidates won in 3 out of 5 house districts that BVM targeted, including the competitive HD (House District) 97 which produced the decisive 51st Democratic seat.”

Albright said BVM supported the work of partners such as the Ohio Unity Coalition with canvassing, texting, and phone banking. 

“In Ohio, voters were able to pass two ballot referendums. The first enshrined a constitutional right to abortion and the second legalized recreational marijuana use,” he said.

Albright said 83 percent of Black Ohioans voted in the affirmative for the abortion issue, while African-Americans were 72 percent of those who voted for legalization of recreational marijuana.

During an interview with a Trice Edney reporter, Albright said his organization has been working “to change the discourse, change the narrative and lean into power we already have.”

“The issues that we focus are largely issues that affect the Black community. When we come up everybody comes up on voting rights, economic justice and Medicaid expansion,” said Albright. “There’s no point in US history where Black folks didn’t advance our interests that didn’t advance the nation. It’s about everybody being able to advance. The way we organize is to focus on Black-led organizations that serve the Black community, but we do this in partnership with organizations on the ground.”

Albright – a 2020 Soros Fellow who has been deeply involved in the activist-led efforts and a lawsuit that forced the redrawing of a congressional district map in Alabama – said he usually doesn’t spend much time celebrating because those white supremacists in politics and elsewhere are always working to cook up voter suppression strategies designed to rob African Americans’ constitutional rights. He said he’s acutely aware of the games certain legislators and policymakers play, all with the intent of blocking any attempts by he, fellow activists and voting rights advocates who are working to bring parity and justice to the electoral process.

“They are trying to take away our votes. They are not guided by commonsense, justice or rightness,” said Albright. “We see anti-Black white supremacy in the Alabama legislature. White supremacy never takes a day off. It’s always playing the long game. When you’re in power, you can play the long game.”

Black Unemployment Remains High

Nov. 7, 2023

Blackunemploymentphoto

SPECIAL TO THE TRICE EDNEY NEWS WIRE FROM BLACKMANSSTREET.TODAY

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The jobless rate in October for Black men and Black women was 5.8 percent, the highest among all other groups surveyed.

Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 150,000 jobs in October, and the unemployment rate changed little at 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Job gains occurred in health care, government, and social assistance. Employment declined in manufacturing due to strike activity.

Among the other major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult men (3.7 percent), adult women (3.3 percent), teenagers (13.2 percent), Whites (3.5 percent), Asians (3.1 percent), and Hispanics (4.8 percent).

A Segregationist in the House By Julianne Malveaux

NEWS ANALYSIS

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Many are rejoicing that Republicans finally got around to electing a speaker, thus breaking the logjam that began when Trump acolyte Matt Goetz (R-FL) introduced legislation to eliminate Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).  In selecting Louisiana's Mike Johnson, Republicans chose a self-avowed "evangelical Southern Christian" (read racist segregationist) who is anti-choice, anti-gay rights (and marriage), and anti-education.  Johnson is an affable segregationist who has made few enemies in his scant four terms in Congress.

 The media keeps describing him as "unknown." Still, while he is a Congressman who does not stand out in a crowd, he is hardly unknown to the Republican inner circle who followed his lead when he opposed counting the electoral votes that chose President Joe Biden.  House Republicans didn't just vote for an affable unknown; they voted for a segregationist election denier who is in close touch with the former President.  So, those who say they want a post-Trump Republican Party are not telling the truth.  These Republicans want a House speaker who is Trump without the vitriol but a segregationist nonetheless.  They are so eager to have this election denier at their helm because many of them are closet election deniers.  And in embracing this election denier, they are rejecting the Constitution and the role of law in our politics. 

They want to win at any cost, even if it means that they embrace segregation.  I'm not surprised!  These are the people who want to go back to the "good old days" when Black people stayed in our place, women remained in the kitchen, gay folks were invisible, and abortion was unheard of.  Are there any moderate Republicans?  Are there any unafraid of the despotic former President? 

Congressman Johnson's career has been marked by his assertive willingness to take away the rights of others, all done with the smile that contributes to his reputation for friendliness.  So, he would impose a national ban on abortion.  He would disallow gay people from having sex in their own homes.  He describes gay marriage as "deviant," but he does it with a smile.  He doesn't raise his voice or shake his fist.  He simply works to take away other people's rights.

Johnson’s views on women and abortion are especially troubling.  He says women need to have more children, and outlawing abortion will make that happen.  For him, I suppose, women are nothing more than breed cows designed to populate the labor force whether we want to or not.  He adheres to the "great replacement theory" that Democrats are encouraging immigration to replace "American" voters with immigrants.  He has referred to nonexistent "open borders" in his speeches, following the Trump playbook of inciting resistance against immigrant people.

Johnson has never been a fiery rhetorician.  For the most part, he stays behind the scenes.  And he knows that, as a speaker, he can't spout off extremist positions.  So, when asked about marriage equality, Mike Johnson says it is the law of the land, and he will do nothing to attempt to reverse it.  Roe v. Wade was also the law of the land.  Then came Dobbs, with the three most recent Supreme Court Justices – Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Comey-Barrett all swore under oath that they would "uphold the law of the land" and would not nullify Roe.  But they did it in the Dobbs case when they got an opening.  I will not be surprised if, given new Congressional conservative leadership, they support the same thing in this Supreme Court.

 There are many regressive legislative possibilities on the table for a segregationist like Mike Johnson.  He has already indicated that he will proceed with a Biden impeachment inquiry.  He is likely to support anything that undermines affirmative action both in higher education and in the workplace, with the encouragement of deep pockets racists.  Alarmingly, Johnson has been described by Alex Johnson, Executive Director of Social Security Works, as "an enemy of Social Security."  If the House Speaker had his way, he would raise the retirement age, lower the cost of living increases, and privatize Social Security.  And Republican legislators would likely go along with it, even though they represent Social Security recipients, to embrace a Trump-driven segregationist agenda.

 Some describe Mike Johnson’s rise to the speakership as the accidental elevation of a relative unknown.  I say it was planned.  Look at his record.  Look at his statements.  And understand that the fight for economic and social justice is “on” with the segregationist leader in the House.

Dr. Julianne Malveaux is an economist and author.  She can be reached at juliannemalveaux.com

         

Nation’s Credit Card Debt Passes $1 Trillion By Charlene Crowell

 Nov. 7, 2023

CFPB Report Image

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - For the first time since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) began collecting credit card data, the nation’s related debt reached an all-time high of $1 trillion in 2022. Newresearch released in late October examines how and why this debt grew, but also how emerging trends in card usage affect the day-to-day lives of consumers.  

While companies charged consumers more than $105 billion in interest and more than $25 billion in fees, average credit card balances per cardholder returned to about $5,300, about the same as before the pandemic. At the same time, more cardholders are being charged late fees, falling behind on payments, and facing higher costs on growing debt.  

Today nearly one in 10 consumers is caught in what CFPB terms ‘persistent debt’, charged more in interest and fees than they pay toward the principal owed, a pattern that makes each passing month’s charges increasingly harder to avoid. Average credit card minimum payments on revolving credit accounts now reach over $100 per month and are also a contributing factor to rising late fees and overall debt. 

"With credit card debt crossing the trillion- dollar mark, we will be working to prevent bait-and-switch tactics when it comes to rewards and to increase refinancing activity so consumers can get lower rates,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra 

Increased indebtedness also translated into record industry profits, now higher than those reached in pre-pandemic years. Two key factors, according to the report, significantly contributed to industry profitability: an average APR margin of 15.4 percentage points above the prime rate in 2022, and only 10 credit card companies dominating the marketplace.  

Although the nation has nearly 4,000 credit card issuers, four-fifths – 80 percent – of the card activity was with one of the firms in the top10.  

The highest credit card APRs are, as with other consumer financial products, among consumers who carry high credit card balances, missed payment(s), or delinquent accounts, and have subprime credit ratings, scores of less than 670 in a range of 300- 850.  Consumers who have filed bankruptcies can also expect that action to affect their credit scores for seven years thereafter.  

A 2019 report by Experian, one of the nation’s three credit card bureaus, found that more than a third of consumers – 34.8 percent – were classified as subprime. Millennials comprised the largest number of subprime borrowers.   

According to Experian, “Prime consumers tend to have more mortgages and credit card accounts, while subprime consumers have more student loans and personal loans…Subprime consumers have twice as many personal loan accounts as prime consumers on average. That said, their average balance is less than half of prime consumers’ average balance.” 

CFPB’s new credit card report found that many cardholders with subprime scores paid 30 to 40 cents in interest and fees per dollar borrowed each year. Further, consumers using reward cards that earn bonus points for frequent usage, earned just 27 percent of rewards at major credit card companies, but paid 94 percent of total interest and fees for carrying debt from month to month.   

Last year, and for the first time since 2015, CFPB found a spike in over-limit transactions. According to the report, “Recent changes in incidence are also driven by accounts with subprime scores. Over-limit transactions tend to be more common among lower-score cardholders since these cardholders typically have lower credit limits and higher credit utilization than higher-score cardholders, making it more likely that even a modest purchase might exceed their credit limit.” 

Along with high profits, CFPB’s new report documents a growing consumer shift toward digital communications, websites and mobile apps now used by nearly 80 percent of cardholders to manage card usage and make payments. Among consumers ages 25 and younger, 95 percent used mobile apps for card transactions.    

Consistent with consumer practices, credit card companies and debt collectors are now relying more on text messaging and email to contact borrowers about past-due balances, in addition to phone calls or postal mail.  

In separate and independent findings, the New York Federal Reserve’s Liberty Street blog also noted changing credit card practices earlier this year.  

“[T]here were 18.3 million borrowers behind on a credit card at the end of 2022 compared to 15.8 million at the end of 2019. Instead, the evidence suggests that higher prices and higher interest rates are the more likely culprits driving delinquencies… [O]n a person-level, this financial distress is real, and the delinquent marks will impact their access to credit for years to come.”  

Charlene Crowell is a senior fellow with the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at CharleneThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Biden Applauded for Prioritizing Civil Rights Amidst Growing Artificial Intelligence Technology - But Did He Go Far Enough? By Hazel Trice Edney

BidenPresident

President Joseph Biden

MayaWiley

Maya Wiley, president, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

DamonHewitt

Damon Hewitt, LCCR president

BarackObama

Former President Barack Obama

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - President Joe Biden is receiving wide applause among Black leadership for his executive order that attempts to assure that artificial intelligence (AI) remains within boundaries that respect civil rights and adhere to principles of democracy. But the question remains whether the executive order goes far enough to protect Black people - particular from abusive law enforcement.

“We believe in the potential for AI to be a powerful tool to help advance our vision of opportunity and prosperity for Black and Brown people. But we cannot let the tools of the future reinforce the mistakes of the past. Guardrails must be implemented now to ensure that this emerging technology centers equity at every step of development and implementation,” said Damon Hewitt, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (LCCR), in a statement issued following Biden’s signing of the executive order. “This executive order is a critical step to help guard against algorithmic bias and discrimination.  It can be the beginning of a pathway to a future where AI empowers instead of oppresses.”

Hewitt says the executive order prepares the federal government “to prevent and address bias and discrimination in new technologies; but more action is needed to fully address harmful AI used by law enforcement.”

Tech experts have pointed out that abusive AI tactics have been racially biased, especially against Black people.

An article titled, “Racial Discrimination in Face Recognition Technology,” written by Harvard University biotech consultant, Alex Najibi, points out that face recognition technology, a form of AI often used by police departments and in airport screening, as well as employment and housing decisions, has been known to involve “significant racial bias, particularly against Black Americans.”

Najibi adds, “Even if accurate, face recognition empowers a law enforcement system with a long history of racist and anti-activist surveillance and can widen pre-existing inequalities.”

He writes that “despite widespread adoption, face recognition was recently banned for use by police and local agencies in several cities, including Boston and San Francisco” because face recognition “is the least accurate” of all recognition technologies such as fingerprinting.

While applauding the Administration on its initial steps to direct agencies to determine how AI is used in criminal justice, the LCCR says Biden’s executive order does not go far enough to actually address “harmful uses of AI by law enforcement agencies, such as the discriminatory use of facial recognition technologies.”

President Barack Obama, who also released a statement, pointed out that he asked his staff seven years ago to study “how artificial intelligence could play a growing role in the future of the United States.”

He pointed out additional problems that could occur, including national security threats.

“We don’t want anyone with an internet connection to be able to create a new strain of smallpox, access nuclear codes, or attack our critical infrastructure. And we have to make sure this technology doesn’t fall into the hands of people who want to use it to turbocharge things like cybercrime and fraud,” Obama states.

He credited organizations such as the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and Upturn to the Alignment Research Center for “tackling these questions, and making sure more people feel like their concerns are being heard and addressed.”

The Leadership Conference, led by Maya Wiley, president, wrote a letter to Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris on August 4, urging the Administration to focus Biden’s executive order on “protecting the American public from the current and potential harms of this technology— including threats to people’s rights, civil liberties, opportunities, jobs, economic well-being, and access to critical resources and services.” That letter was co-signed by LCCR, the NAACP, and the Center for American Progress among others.

The Executive Order directs the following requirements for organizations using AI:

  • Require that developers of the most powerful AI systems share their safety test results and other critical information with the U.S. government. 
  • Develop standards, tools, and tests to help ensure that AI systems are safe, secure, and trustworthy. 
  • Protect against the risks of using AI to engineer dangerous biological materials by developing strong new standards for biological synthesis screening.
  • Protect Americans from AI-enabled fraud and deception by establishing standards and best practices for detecting AI-generated content and authenticating official content.
  • Establish an advanced cybersecurity program to develop AI tools to find and fix vulnerabilities in critical software.
  • Order the development of a National Security Memorandum that directs further actions on AI and security.

The focus of the executive order is primarily to assure a fair and safe future while using AI, Biden says. But the LCCR insists the order needs more work and vows to continue working with the Administration to that end.

Hewitt concluded, “To make that future a reality, civil rights-focused protections must apply to every aspect of our lives touched by AI technology, including the harmful use of AI by law enforcement. We look forward to working with the Biden Administration on how we can address the full scope of this challenge and fully leverage the opportunity before us.” 

X